Postby Graham.Fountain » 06 Oct 2014 11:50
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Century Gothic, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Hasbeen</i>
I think from memory we found it used the inlet manifold water flow to let the rear of the head flow to the water pump.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
No, sorry, don't understand that. Like I wrote, the Sprint has no external connection to the cooling system at the back of the head. Rather, both connections to the cabin heater come from under the manifold. As I remember - and I can't look because doly's in the garage having the bushes poly'ed - one is from the pump cover and one from the manifold.
I would have to look how water runs through the Sprint's inlet manifold, and I haven't a 2 valve one to compare with, but I thought, in both cases, that all the wet holes between the head and manifold were at the front end. I'm sure that's true for the 4 valve's twin choke manifold, which is the one I've stared at most - because it's unquestionably, and by far, the prettiest. So, if the 2 valve's head develops a hot spot without that connection, I don't see why the Sprint's does not.
Especially as, as ironically alluded to in last post, the Sprint generates slightly more power and has a smaller rad. The 190ish bhp version of A TR7 16V I had didn’t have such a connection, and never cooked. The worst thing ever happened to that was a Discovery ran in the back of it – must fit weaker brakes in future.
Confusingly, the 4 valve TR7 Sprint had such a connection at the back of the head, and the under manifold pipework connections were like the 2 valve TR7's, with only one connection to the heater core. However, I always assumed that was to do with keeping the installation of the engine assembly the same on the production line (and even BL would have been embarrassed by a pipe running from the manifold, to near the back of the head, only to turn 180 and go back to the connections to the heater core on the bulkhead), and not because the installation in the TR7's engine bay needed it when it didn't in the doly's.
So I’m not saying that either does or doesn't have this hotspot problem, or that there's not some other difference, just that I don't understand it.
Graham
TR7 Sprint VVC 697S (some of)
TR7 DHC Sprint A TR7 16V (fake, rusty):
B&Y '73 Doly Sprint (kids!)