Anonymous

Gearbox mounting.

The all purpose forum for any TR7/8 related topics.
Post Reply
carlton
Wedgling
Posts: 10
Joined: 20 Dec 2015 23:31

Gearbox mounting.

Postby carlton » 10 Sep 2017 17:27

Hi all.
Anyone got a photo of the gearbox mount in situ. I can't quite figure out why so much of the mount appears to be below the hole in the mounting cross member and wonder if it has dropped as I understand these mounts are prone to do.
Thanks.

Monkeyzak
Rust Hunter
Posts: 203
Joined: 02 Feb 2017 18:58
Location: Near Glasgow

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby Monkeyzak » 10 Sep 2017 17:32

I had the same problem. Have a look at the Rimmer's parts drawing online. I had a part in the wrong place. It shows how it should go back together

seven
Swagester
Posts: 903
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 17:21
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby seven » 10 Sep 2017 17:52

Probably not the best condition gearbox mount, but in situ
Attachments
DSC01470 (Small).JPG
DSC01470 (Small).JPG (64.46 KiB) Viewed 5954 times
Triumph TR7 DHC '81
Triumph 2.5 Estate '73
Triumph 2.5PI Saloon '69
Mercedes SLK250 '14
Mercedes SL55 AMG '02
Mercedes E320 '05
Chevrolet Camaro '93
Mitsubishi Canter '01
Volvo 262c '78
Peugeot J5 '91
Kawasaki GPZ '93

The car is unable to handle my driving capabilities

Beans
TRemendous
Posts: 7771
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 19:29
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby Beans » 10 Sep 2017 23:18

Viewed from the back on a car that was restored some 7 years ago;

Image
Image
1976 TR7 FHC (currently being restored ...)
1980 TR7 DHC (my first car, a.k.a. Kermette)
1981 TR7 FHC (Sprint engined a.k.a. 't Kreng)

http://www.tr7beans.blogspot.com/

carlton
Wedgling
Posts: 10
Joined: 20 Dec 2015 23:31

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby carlton » 11 Sep 2017 01:31

Thanks for that. I guess then that when it drops the lowest metal part shown in the photo stays in the same place and the rubber element perishes, breaks away and slides over it??

seven
Swagester
Posts: 903
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 17:21
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby seven » 11 Sep 2017 11:14

carlton wrote:Thanks for that. I guess then that when it drops the lowest metal part shown in the photo stays in the same place and the rubber element perishes, breaks away and slides over it??


Certainly looks that way, I guessing the rear of the gearbox drops to as the mount slow melts and oozes eeewwwww :shock:
Triumph TR7 DHC '81
Triumph 2.5 Estate '73
Triumph 2.5PI Saloon '69
Mercedes SLK250 '14
Mercedes SL55 AMG '02
Mercedes E320 '05
Chevrolet Camaro '93
Mitsubishi Canter '01
Volvo 262c '78
Peugeot J5 '91
Kawasaki GPZ '93

The car is unable to handle my driving capabilities

Beans
TRemendous
Posts: 7771
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 19:29
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby Beans » 11 Sep 2017 15:27

On top (between rubber mount and distance piece) sits a movement restriction plate.
This should prevent the box from dropping to much when the rubber tears out.

Image
Image
1976 TR7 FHC (currently being restored ...)
1980 TR7 DHC (my first car, a.k.a. Kermette)
1981 TR7 FHC (Sprint engined a.k.a. 't Kreng)

http://www.tr7beans.blogspot.com/

carlton
Wedgling
Posts: 10
Joined: 20 Dec 2015 23:31

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby carlton » 11 Sep 2017 22:42

Hi. Sorry about all the questions! Why is so much of the mount evident below the mounting plate where to my (no doubt ill informed mind) it seems to serve no useful purpose? Would it be evident viewing the mount from the back of the car that the gearbox mounting has dropped or do I need to view the top of the mounting cross member? Is it common for the mount to fail and the gearbox to drop sufficiently to damage or fracture the exhaust or manifold? The mounting is over 30 years old so I guess it is probably knackered. Thanks.

saabfast
TRiffic
Posts: 1936
Joined: 03 Feb 2006 08:17
Location: Bexhill-on-Sea

Re: Gearbox mounting.

Postby saabfast » 12 Sep 2017 12:27

As above, the mounting cannot drop a lot due to the arrangement with the plate above. If the rubber gets that soggy or fails it will just transmit more noise and vibration to the crossmember as it will have direct metal to metal contact. The bigger problem in a way is failure of the rubber mounts on the extension above the tailshaft which can let the extension drop down onto the prop UJ/CV joint.
Alan
Saab 9-5 2.3t Vector Auto Estate Stage 1
Saab 9-3 2.0 SE Turbo Convertible
'81 TR7 DHC
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests